|
Sociological Dichotomies |
|
|
Culture |
Structure |
|
Macro |
Micro |
|
Quantitative |
Qualitative |
|
Positivism |
Frankfurt
School & Realism |
Overhead
"Culture
is the symbolic aspect, such as religion, decoration, and folklore.
Organization is the corporate aspect, or the capacity of collective
action" (Black 1976,
p.1).
Another
approach:
Culture:
pattern of perception, thinking, or feeling.
Social Structure: pattern of social behavior
Cultural explanation of
social structure:
values & beliefs ==
influence ===> socially patterned behavior
Structural explanation of
social culture:
Positivism:
·
Compte, Durkheim, Popper
·
Science can only deal with
observable entities
·
General laws and theories
·
Properties which have to be
directly testable
·
Exact (minute)
operationalization
Realism:
·
Causal explanations often rely
on underlying properties that are actually not observed
·
Sociology is not explaining but
understanding
·
Importance of the intentions
and motives of actors
Frankfurt
School:
·
Today Habermas
Black, Donald. The Behavior of Law. 1976. New York : Academic Press.
My
Personal Response to Blacks Epistemology of Pure Sociology, taken from a
four page letter. After my review I conclude:
Now, I mentioned that this is one side of sociology, the pure top
down approach. Donald, why are you able to come up with your
brilliant idea
that law varies directly with relational distance?
How did you discover
this theory. You had to engage with a world where you observed different
occurrences that made you come up with your idea. Here you profited highly
from your ability of sociological observation. That is exactly the
reason why I really love your book The Manners and Customs of the
Police. The ordinary non sociologist, or undergraduate student, might in
fact learn more from your excellent observations than from you theoretical
reflection of this empirical reality.
Epistemology is the study of the nature and limits of knowledge. In The Epistemology of Pure Sociology you describe one half of the nature. Since you miss the other half you cannot estimate the limits of knowledge. I am probably young and green enough for the dream to, once, hold the whole coin in my hand. Getting a description of one side of the coin is a great help on this way.
Interaction
of cultural and structural phenomena on the micro and macro dimensions
Example:
grade inflation
Micro
level, cultural:
Macro level, structural:
Micro level, structural:
Macro level cultural:
Four
Styles of Social Control
|
|
Penal |
Compensatory |
Therapeutic |
Conciliatory |
|
Standard |
Prohibition |
Obligation |
Normality |
Harmony |
|
Initiation
of case |
Guilt |
Debt |
Need |
Conflict |
|
Identity
of deviant |
Offender |
Debtor |
Victim |
Disputant |
|
Solution |
Punishment |
Payment |
Help |
Resolution |
Main
Theory in the introduction [later specified in chapter 6]:
Law
varies directly with relational distance. It contains no assumptions,
assertions, or implications about the human mind or even human beings as such.
Hypothesis
T2:
Law varies directly with stratification.
T2A:
Law varies directly with rank.
T2B:
Downward law is greater than upward law.
T2B1:
Downward law varies directly with vertical distance.
T2B2:
Upward law varies inversely with vertical distance.
T3A: "The relationship between law and
differentiation is curvilinear
T3B:
The relationship between law and relational distance is curvilinear.
T3C1:
Centrifugal law is greater than centripetal law.
T3C2:
Centrifugal law varies directly with radial distance.
T3C3:
Centripetal law varies inversely with radial distance.
T4:
Law varies directly with culture.
T4A: Law is greater in a direction toward less culture
than toward more culture.
T4A1:
In a direction toward less culture, law varies directly with cultural
distance.
T4A2:
In a direction toward more culture, law varies.
T4B:
Law varies directly with conventionality.
T4B1:
Law is greater in a direction toward less conventionality than toward
more conventionality.
T4C1:
In a direction toward less conventionality law varies directly with
cultural distance.
T4C2:
In a direction toward more conventionality law varies inversely with
cultural distance.
T4A2:
The relationship between law and culture is curvilinear.
T5:
Law varies directly with organization.
T5A:
Law is greater in a direction toward less organization than toward more
organization.
T5A1:
In a direction toward less organization, law varies directly with
organizational distance.
T5A2: In a direction toward more organization, law varies inversely
with organizational distance.
T6:
Law varies inversely with other social control.
[stated in the introduction]
T6A:
Law varies directly with respectability.
T6B:
Law is greater in a direction toward less respectability than toward
more respectability.
T6C1:
In a direction toward less respectability, law varies directly with
normative distance.
T6C2:
In a direction toward more respectability, law varies inversely with
normative distance.
T7: Anarchy is social life without law (Definition).
Back to the homepage of Dr. Andreas Schneider http://www2.tltc.ttu.edu/Schneider/
Disclaimer: The documents linked to other sources on the WWW, others than http://www2.tltc.ttu.edu/Schneider/ and its subdirectories, do not necessarily express the views of Texas Tech University or Dr. Andreas Schneider. @Copyright 2005 Andreas Schneider