Goode,
Erich and Nachman Ben-Yehuda. 1994. Moral Panics.
Two
camps in the definition of deviance
The
objective approach
·
Morals
are clearly stated in the bible
·
There is
good and bad, right and wrong, virtue and evil
·
Immorality
is immanent, it exists in the act itself
·
There are
crimes against nature
·
Groups:
Inquisition, Nazis, Christian, Moslem or Jewish Fundamentalists, anti-abortion
pro-lifers…
The
subjective approach acknowledges different moralities.
Morality is relative to culture and historic time.
·
Constructionist,
subjectivists, or relativists
·
The same
act can be moral or immoral
o
in
different cultures
o
at
different historic times
o
in
different subcultures
·
Immorality
is not immanent, it does not exits within the behavior but depends on the
interpretation of the behavior
·
Importance
of the audience
·
Deviance
is situational
·
Deviance
is constructed
·
Defiance
reflects power differentials in society
·
“Criminalization
is the explicit use of power to impose the view of one specific symbolic-moral
universe on other universes” (Ben-Yehuda, 1990, p.65).
1.
Moderate Constructionists:
·
although
moral and deviance cannot be defined
by the objective severity of the condition they cause, there is a relationship
between the objective damage to society and the likelihood that an act will be
seen as immoral.
2.
Strict Constructionists:
“It
is impossible to determine the objective damage and subjective concern because there
is no such thing as objectivity in the first place”. (p.94)
Constructionism: Satanic Ritual Abuse
Victor,
Jeffrey S. 1994. Fundamentalist Religion and the Moral Crusade against
Satanism: the Social Construction of Deviant Behavior. Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal 15:305-334.
To
complement the readings of
Goode,
Erich and Nachman Ben-Yehuda. 1994. Moral
Panics. Good overview of the moral
crusade against Satanism.
Adds
(1)
the
function of fundamentalist churches,
(2)
the
police, and
(3)
false
memory syndrome to the discussion of the social construction of Satanism.
Here are some key quotes:
overehads
There
is no Satanism without Christianity.
"Fundamentalist
religion plays a central role in the social construction of satanic cult crime
because it offers
·
a
receptive ideology,
·
a
well-established communication network,
and
organizational resources for moral crusaders"(p.305).
Definition
of Christian Fundamentalism
“Christian
fundamentalism is an ultraconservative ideology that uses orthodox, evangelical
Protestantism to give supernatural sanction to attacks on contemporary social
change” (p.314).
“Fundamentalist
Protestants can usually be distinguished from other evangelicals by their belief
in the immanent end of the world, after which only true believers in Christ will
be saved; strict biblical literalism; and a personal morality that forbids
drinking, dancing and gambling (Ammerman 1987)”(pp. 313 and 315).
“While
some fundamentalists proudly identify themselves fundamentalists, others prefer
to regard themselves as "born-again" or "bible-believing"”
(p.315).
It
does not matter which religion you have:
“American fundamentalists share with Islamic, Hindu, and Jewish fundamentalists a view of themselves as being under siege by the sinful modern society, and a fierce need to defend traditional cultural pattern” (p.315).
Schwartz, Richard, and Jermone Skolnick. 1996. Legal Stigma. In: Rubington, Earl and Martin Weinberg. 1996. Deviance: The Interactionist Perspective, Sixth Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. 239-243.
IV: 4 Job application folders indicating different degrees or no criminal
record were sent to 23 employers.
DV: success of applications
|
|
No
record |
Acquitted
with letter of judge certifying innocence |
Acquitted
without letter |
Convicted |
|
Positive
Response |
36 |
24 |
12 |
4 |
|
Negative
response |
64 |
76 |
88 |
96 |
MOVIE ABOUT FALSE MEMORY SYNDROME
Back to the homepage of Dr. Andreas Schneider http://www2.tltc.ttu.edu/Schneider/
Disclaimer: The documents linked to other sources on the WWW, others than http://www2.tltc.ttu.edu/Schneider/ and its subdirectories, do not necessarily express the views of Texas Tech University or Dr. Andreas Schneider. @Copyright 2005 Andreas Schneider