MacKinnon, Neil J. 1994. Symbolic Interactionism as Affect Control. Albany: State University of New York Press. Chapter 3: Cognition, Affect and Motivation
overhead 1
Three Basic Perspectives about the Relation between Cognition and Affect
I. Rigid Distinction between Cognition and Affect leads to the Primacy Debate.
1. Cognition => Affect
2. Affect => Cognition
II. Affect and Cognition as analytical entities
1. Cognitions and Affect are Complementary
2. Cognition and Affect: Two Sides of the same Coin (Sentiment)
III. No Distinction between Cognition and Affect
1. There are only Sentiments:
2. There are only Sentiments with different Intensity
overhead 2
Affect Control Theory and Cognitive Dissonance Theory
|
ACT |
Cognitive Dissonance |
|
Social: Intersubjectivity
|
Nonsocial: Innersubjectivity Cognitions are isolated within the individual |
|
Social: Deflection is the difference between a social event (ABO) and the fundamental sentiments of its components (A,B, and O) |
Nonsocial: Dissonance is the inconsistency = imbalanced state = disharmonious state (Heider) = incongruity (Osgood & Tannenbaum) between two cognitions |
|
Social: Magnitude of Deflection depends on the extent to which social norms about social behavior are violated. |
Nonsocial: Magnitude of Dissonance depends on
|
|
Social: Production and resolution of affective deflection is based on social events. |
Nonsocial: Production and resolution of cognitive dissonance is based on individual cognitions. |
|
Social: Relatedness of Sentiments Situated identities are define relations between people at a particular time and place. |
Nonsocial: The lack of control for the relatedness of cognitions contribute to the main problem of CD theory: “which cognitions are relevant? Ask Leo” |
|
Sentiments consider affect and cognition. |
Only cognitions are considered. |
|
Disruption or imbalance refers to inconsistent affective states. |
Disruption or imbalance refers to inconsistent cognitions. |
|
Deflection can be either positive or negative. |
Dissonance can only be negative. |
Disclaimer: The documents linked to other sources on the WWW, others than http://www2.tltc.ttu.edu/Schneider/ and its subdirectories, do not necessarily express the views of Texas Tech University or Dr. Andreas Schneider. @Copyright 2008 Andreas Schneider