Cross-cultural Differences in Sexual Violence
In this session, I integrate my prior work in Sexual Deviance and Violence:
Publications
Schneider, Andreas. 1996. Sexual-Erotic Emotions in the U.S. in Cross-cultural Comparison. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 16:123-143.
Schneider, Andreas. 1999. "The Violent Character of Sexual-Eroticism in Cross-cultural Comparison." International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy l8:81-100.
Schneider, Andreas 2002. “A Possible Link Between Stigmatization of Sexual-Erotic Identities and Sexual Violence”. Sexuality & Culture 6,4.
Papers Presented
Schneider, Andreas. 2001. "A Model of Sexual Emancipation and Constraint."
Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Anaheim. Sociological Abstracts; full version available at Sociology*Express.Schneider, Andreas.1998 "The Emotional Basis for Violence in Sexual-Erotic Identities: Germany and the U.S." Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco.
Schneider, Andreas.1995 "Sexual-Erotic Emotions in the U.S. in Cross-cultural Comparison." Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Washington D.C.
Schneider, Andreas.1994 "Cross-Cultural Differences of Authoritative and Sexual Role-identities." Table for Comparative Social Psychology. International Sociological Association, Bielefeld.
Schneider, Andreas.1994 "The Affective Basis of Sexual Role-Identities in the U.S. and Germany." Table for Social Psychology of Emotions. International Sociological Association, Bielefeld.
Data Collections:
1995. Data collection of newsgroups with sexual-erotic content for the Kinsey Institute Indiana.
1996. Establishing a time series in the study of newsgroups with sexual-erotic content for the Kinsey Institute Indiana.
I. Identity emotion link. McKinnon
Characteristic Emotions: If a person confirms her identity, her emotions will be equal to the EPA profile of her fundamental identity.
II. Cross-cultural Differences in
Sexual-erotic Identities
Classification of identities as being sexual-erotic
Affective meaning
Cognitive meaning
a) connotative meaning
b) denotative meaning
Categories of Cultural Agreement and Disagreement
One category of inter-cultural agreement:
Common components: Cultures agree on structural meaning to the degree to which categories of the same structural meaning share a common component.
Two categories of inter-cultural disagreement:
(a) Non-common components are the remainder of common components. They indicate cross-cultural disagreement in structural meaning. The term "non-common components" will be used if the category of the role identities of interest exists in both cultures.
(b) Overlapping components: If the same role identity reflects different structural categories in different cultures, structural meanings for this role identity overlaps.
Small Common Component And Large Non-Common Components
the small overlapping component of the sexual-erotic domain strongly indicates cross-cultural differences.

Only about 20% of the U.S. sexual-erotic identities
are also in the German sexual-erotic cluster.
Large Overlapping Component
The cross-cultural interpretation of the American sexual-erotic cluster is comprehensive.

Figure 2: American and German sexual-erotic cluster and the German cluster of coercive-deviance: The common component and the overlapping component.
List of 20 Identities in the Common Component
bisexual brat callgirl concubine cynic fool gambler gigolo hippie informant lesbian pornostar prostitute runaway scamp streetwalker stripper truant weirdo whore
Identities of the oldest profession made up three of the ten most stigmatized identities in the common component.
Identities of the legal sexual entertainment industry, topless dancers, pornostars, and strippers, make up another three of the ten of the identities identified as highly stigmatized.
the remaining sexual-erotic identities, the bisexual, adulterer, intimate, and the playboy
Quantitative Comparison of Sexual Erotic Identities
1. Sexual-erotic identities that are appreciated in the German population are stigmatized in the U.S. population (table 1).
Table 1 Mean Evaluation Ratings on Semantic Differential Scales ranging from -4.33 to +4.33. For American and German Identities in the Common Component (CC) of American and German Sexual Cluster (n=20).
| Category | males | females | ||
| U.S. | German | U.S. | German | |
| CC (n=20 | -0.86 | 0.08 | -1.03 | 0.10 |
Linking Emotions to Identities
Quantitative part: Emotions, whose affective meanings correspond most closely to the affective meanings of an ideal typical sexual identity in each culture are selected to represent each culture.
Qualitative part: Emotions that match sexual-erotic
identities are analyzed and compared between cultures.
Results
The identity-emotion link of Heise is used to choose emotions that fit the EPA ratings of the common component of sexual-eroticism in each culture.
The Model
A Cultural Model of Sexual Violence

Consequences of Sexual Constraint an Emancipation
Constraint
Emancipation
Disclaimer: The documents linked to other sources on the WWW, others than http://www2.tltc.ttu.edu/Schneider/ and its subdirectories, do not necessarily express the views of Texas Tech University or Dr. Andreas Schneider. @Copyright 2002 Andreas Schneider