Aggression and Conflict

 I.                Definition(s) of Aggression

II.           Theories of Aggression

III.      Example Experiments and Applications

I. Definition

Aggression =      “Intentional harm done by one person to another” (Wiggins et al. p.372)

Aggression can be further distinguished according to the criteria of:

1. intent

2. legitimacy

3. content

4. object


1. Intent or Motive to show aggressive behavior

 a)     Intend to harm someone

b)     to achieve something else: instrumental aggression

c)     to indicate that the other=s party is wrong: punishment, sanction

 

2. Legitimacy to show aggressive behavior

A) consistent with social norms: discipline or self-defense

B) contrary to social norms: abuse, brutality, or neglect

 

3. Content

A) Physiological

B) Psychological

 

4. Object of aggression

A) Others

B) Self

C) Animals

 

II. Some Theoretical Approaches

1. Evolutionary Views on Aggression

A)   Ethological Perspective

Konrad Lorenz and Eibl-Eibesfeld

·       During their evolutionary history, humans developed mechanisms to cope with their very limited killing capacities.

·       Killing with bare hands involves hearing the cries, sense the breath, and feel and smell the body of the opponent.

·       Today, when people fire at objects on their radar screens, these inhibitory mechanisms cannot work.

 

B)    Sociobiological Perspective

·       Focuses on the Gene rather than the individual.  Aggression is a strategy that allows some genes to compete and survive at the expense of others

 

2. Freud: Frustration leads to Aggression

 

Freud’s frustration-aggression hypothesis became much more refined (e.g. Berkowitz)

“Anger remains a motivating force until it is discharged though aggressive behavior”(p.382)

The two basic assumptions are:

1. Frustration produces aggression.

2. Aggression never occurs without prior frustration.

 

overhead

Anger in the Frustration-Aggression Theory:

Frustration    =>    Anger    =>    Aggressive Behavior

                     causes          motivates

 

We reduce aggression by showing aggressive behavior:

 

Displacement and Catharsis

Displacement:        When anger becomes free-floating, that is, detached form its source, it can be discharged through aggressive behavior against another person, group or object.

                                Examples: Scapegoating, (legal) aggression against drug consumers, pedophiles...  

Catharsis:       lessening aggressive energy by discharging it through aggressive behavior.  This is the hydraulic model of psychology.

                        Stryker’s example of a boiling pot.  Steam builds up as pressure, only lifting the cover will vent the steam and reduce the pressure.

 

Can we really reduce anger by aggressive behavior?

How valid is the assumption that we can reduce anger, the cause of aggressive behavior by showing aggressive behavior?

 

3. Cultural View of Aggression

Bandura’s Social Learning theory

Cultural Norms

Culture is a phenomenon of space and time.

Space:      My cross-cultural research on sexual violence

Time:       In England we have detailed criminal records that go back about 700 years in time.  Here we can compare the same culture over time. Compared to his medieval ancestor, an Englishman today faces only 5% the risk of being murdered.

 

IV.        Example Experiments and Applications

1. Military

Another perspective: Limitations in the socialization of aggression.

Grossman D. 1995. On Killing: The psychological cost of learning to kill in war and society. New York: Little Brown.

Grossman is professor in Military science. Throughout human history, certain institutions have specialized to train individuals to kill.

“Despide thousand of years refinement, military training is still unable to do a very effective job of molding individuals into killers” (Moghaddam 1998. 397).

·       In WWII up to 80% of the riflemen failed to fire their weapons at an exposed enemy.  Instead they “froze” or fired in the air or ground.

·       The firing rate was much higher in Vietnam where U.S. soldiers went to a more intensive and sophisticated desensitization program.

·       I argue that anther reason for the more effective killing might lie in the fact that U.S. soldiers were able to use racial stereotypes in their desensitization.

·       In any way, the higher effectiveness apparently came at a higher psychological cost for the killers.  Vietnam veterans suffered unusually high rates of social and psychological problems.

 

2. The Stanford Prison Experiment

Two aspects of the Stanford Prison Experiment:

A. Role conformity

B. Aggression

Can we define the guards= behavior as aggressive?

A. intent     B. legitimacy    C. content

 

Can we define the guards= behavior in terms of the frustration-aggression theory?

Did the guards have to be frustrated in order to show aggression? [questionable]

Can we define the guards= behavior in terms of Cultural Norms?

 

3. Southern Politeness and Aggression

 

Great reading for the interested student:  Cohen, Dov, Joseph Vandello, Sylvia Puente, and Adrian Rantilla. 1999. “When You Call Me That, Smile!”  How Norms for Politeness, Interaction Styles, and Aggression Work Together in Southern Culture.  Social Psychology Quarterly  63:257-275.

 


homepage.gif (237 bytes) Back to the homepage of Dr. Andreas Schneider http://www2.tltc.ttu.edu/Schneider/

Disclaimer: The documents linked to other sources on the WWW, others than http://www2.tltc.ttu.edu/Schneider, http://www2.tltc.ttu.edu/Schneider2 and its subdirectories, do not necessarily express the views of Texas Tech University or Dr. Andreas Schneider. @Copyright 2007 Andreas Schneider