Aggression
and Conflict
I.
Definition(s)
of Aggression
II.
Theories
of Aggression
III.
Example
Experiments and Applications
I.
Definition
Aggression
= Intentional
harm done by one person to another (Wiggins et al. p.372)
Aggression can be further distinguished according to the criteria of:
1. intent
2. legitimacy
3. content
4. object
1. Intent or Motive to
show aggressive behavior
a)
Intend to harm someone
b) to achieve something else: instrumental
aggression
c)
to indicate that the other=s
party is wrong: punishment, sanction
2.
Legitimacy to show aggressive behavior
A) consistent
with social norms: discipline or self-defense
B) contrary to
social norms: abuse, brutality, or neglect
3. Content
A)
Physiological
B)
Psychological
4. Object
of aggression
A) Others
B) Self
C) Animals
II. Some Theoretical Approaches
1.
Evolutionary Views on Aggression
A)
Ethological Perspective
Konrad
Lorenz and Eibl-Eibesfeld
·
During their evolutionary history,
humans developed mechanisms to cope with their very limited killing
capacities.
·
Killing with bare hands involves
hearing the cries, sense the breath, and feel and smell the body of the
opponent.
·
Today, when people fire at objects on
their radar screens, these inhibitory mechanisms cannot work.
B)
Sociobiological Perspective
· Focuses on the Gene rather than the individual. Aggression is a strategy that allows some genes to compete and survive at the expense of others
2. Freud:
Frustration leads to Aggression
Freuds
frustration-aggression hypothesis became much more refined (e.g. Berkowitz)
Anger
remains a motivating force until it is discharged though aggressive
behavior(p.382)
The two basic
assumptions are:
1. Frustration
produces aggression.
2. Aggression
never occurs without prior frustration.
overhead
![]()
Anger in the Frustration-Aggression Theory:
Frustration =>
Anger =>
Aggressive Behavior
causes
motivates
We
reduce aggression by showing aggressive behavior:
Displacement
and Catharsis
Displacement:
When anger becomes free-floating, that is, detached form its source, it
can be discharged through aggressive behavior against another person, group or
object.
Examples:
Scapegoating, (legal) aggression against drug consumers, pedophiles...
Catharsis:
lessening aggressive energy by discharging it through aggressive
behavior. This is
the hydraulic model of psychology.
Strykers
example of a boiling pot. Steam
builds up as pressure, only lifting the cover will vent the steam and reduce
the pressure.
Can we
really reduce anger by aggressive behavior?
How valid is
the assumption that we can reduce anger, the cause of aggressive behavior by
showing aggressive behavior?
3. Cultural
View of Aggression
Banduras
Social Learning theory
Cultural Norms
Culture is a
phenomenon of space and time.
Space:
My cross-cultural research on sexual violence
Time:
In England we have detailed criminal records that go back about 700 years
in time. Here we can compare the
same culture over time.
Another
perspective: Limitations in the socialization of aggression.
Grossman
D. 1995. On Killing: The psychological cost of learning to kill in war and
society. New York: Little Brown.
Grossman
is professor in Military science. Throughout human history, certain institutions
have specialized to train individuals to kill.
Despide
thousand of years refinement, military training is still unable to do a very
effective job of molding individuals into killers (Moghaddam 1998. 397).
·
In WWII up to 80% of the riflemen failed to fire their weapons at
an exposed enemy.
Instead they froze or fired in the air or ground.
·
The firing rate was much higher in Vietnam where U.S. soldiers
went to a more intensive and sophisticated desensitization program.
·
I argue that anther reason for the more effective killing might
lie in the fact that U.S. soldiers were able to use racial stereotypes in their
desensitization.
·
In any way, the higher effectiveness apparently came at a higher
psychological cost for the killers.
Vietnam veterans suffered unusually high rates of social and
psychological problems.
Two aspects of
the Stanford Prison Experiment:
A. Role
conformity
B. Aggression
Can we define the
guards=
behavior as aggressive?
A. intent
B. legitimacy C. content
Can we define the
guards=
behavior in terms of the frustration-aggression theory?
Did the guards
have to be frustrated in order to show aggression? [questionable]
Can we define the guards= behavior in terms of Cultural Norms?
3. Southern
Politeness and Aggression
Great reading for the
interested student: Cohen,
Dov, Joseph Vandello, Sylvia Puente, and Adrian Rantilla. 1999. When You Call
Me That, Smile! How Norms for
Politeness, Interaction Styles, and Aggression Work Together in Southern Culture.
Social Psychology Quarterly 63:257-275.
Disclaimer: The documents linked to other sources on the WWW, others than http://www2.tltc.ttu.edu/Schneider, http://www2.tltc.ttu.edu/Schneider2 and its subdirectories, do not necessarily express the views of Texas Tech University or Dr. Andreas Schneider. @Copyright 2007 Andreas Schneider