Sociological Methods

overhead

Steps in the Research Process


a. Define the Problem

b. Review Literature and Theories

c. Formulate Hypothesis

d. Select Research Design

e. Sampling

f. Collect Data

g. Analyze Data and Interpret Results

h. Report Research Findings

i. Initiation of further Research ==>

 


Relation between Theory, Hypothesis and the Empirical World

Deduction: conclude from the general (abstract) to the concrete (specific)

Induction: conclude from the concrete to the general

Theory: abstract

Hypothesis: more concrete

Observation: concrete empirical world

 

Theory testing:


Example of the Stork

 

Problems concerning causation and theories

A) Variables and their relationships

 

Independent variable: x storks

Dependent variable: y children

Spurious association: x =>y

Causation: z=>x, z=>y

 

Another potential problem: Intervening variable

x => z => y

example: occupational achievement of fathers (x) correlates with the occupational level of sons (y) through the intervening variable of education (z)

Causal chain: x => z and z => y


 

Theories have to be

Empirical: explain!

Fallible: explain!

Causal: explain!

General: explain!

 

What about our stork theory?

 


Sampling:

Stir up the soup (prepare your sample)

Take a spoon full of soup (take a sample)

Taste how salty it is (analyze your sample)

From your sample you can estimate how much salt you have to add for the whole soup (conclude and infer)


 

Sociological Methods

1. Laboratory Experiments

2. Fieldwork or Participant Observation

3. Surveys

4. Documentary Research





1. Laboratory Experiments:

We systematically vary the independent variable (x) and

observe the changes in the dependent variable (y)

Book Example: Zimbardo's (1972) Stanford Prison Experiment



Another famous example: Milgram experiment

Cover story for the subject:
Learning experiment, where the subject is the teacher who has to apply electric
shocks to a student.

Reality: A person exercises authority over the subject to punish the student
who, in reality, is an actor.

Independent variable: social distance of authority figure

Dependent variable: shock intensity given by the subject




Pros and Cons of Experiments

Pros:

Cons:



2. A. Field Experiment

Very similar to a laboratory experiment.  Independent variables and dependent variables are controlled. However, the experminet takes place in a more natural environment.

 

2. B. Fieldwork or Participant observation

Stresses the understanding of a phenomenon

Explorative, rather than cause-effect related as the typical laboratory
experiment.
 

Textbook example: Humphreys Tearoom Trade

·      Participant Observation of public restrooms

·      Men were searching for instant anonymous sex.

 
 

Giddens’ application of theoretical approaches for the tearoom phenomenon.

 

Rational Choice

Question: how is the behavior in a tearoom a rational response following opportunities and overcoming restrains?

 

Interactionsim

What is actually going on in a tearoom?

How did this behavior get established though interaction?

 

Functionalist

How does a tearoom contribute to the continuation of society?

 

Marxist

Are economic class relations apparent in the tearoom?

 

Feminist

How is women’s life affected by this behavior?






3. Surveys

 


Overhead

Sampling:

Stir up the soup (prepare your sample)

Take a spoon full of soup (take a sample)

Taste how salty it is (analyze your sample)

From your sample you can estimate how much salt you have to add for the whole soup (conclude and infer)

 

Statistical Concepts:

Mean

Median

 


 

Difference between Mean and Median

 

Population 1

Population 2

40,000

35,000

30,000

25,000

20,000

90,000

15,000

15,000

15,000

15,000

150,000 / 5 = 30,000

150,000 / 5 = 30,000

 

 

Annual personal income in 2003 was 30,033

(U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2004-2005)

 

 


 

homepage.gif (237 bytes) Back to the homepage of Dr. Andreas Schneider http://www2.tltc.ttu.edu/Schneider/

Disclaimer: The documents linked to other sources on the WWW, others than http://www2.tltc.ttu.edu/Schneider2/ and its subdirectories, do not necessarily express the views of Texas Tech University or Dr. Andreas Schneider. @Copyright 2005 Andreas Schneider